Where I rant about Lehman nuking us and the economy

by @Karoli on April 14, 2009 · 18 comments

in Economy, Energy, Wall Street

This post is neither partisan nor non-partisan. It is simply human. I am not writing this as a Democrat or a Republican or trying to bridge any gap between the two. I am writing it as the mother of three kids who has spent the better part of 50 years trying to make this place where we live better for them.

As the financial news has rolled down and over us, in some case steamrolling, I have trusted that someone was overseeing this mess and the unwinding of the true offenders who are now bankrupt in a way that would cause the least harm to taxpayers and the economy.

I never dreamed I would have to worry about the harm they might do to the world.

Whatever side of the political spectrum you might call home, let’s hope we can agree on this: no bankrupt financial services company should be allowed sit on enough yellowcake to make a nuclear bomb.

You read that right. From Bloomberg:

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. is sitting on enough uranium cake to make a nuclear bomb as it waits for prices of the commodity to rebound, according to traders and nuclear experts.

The bankrupt bank, in the throes of paying off creditors, acquired uranium cake “under a matured commodities contract” and plans to sell it when the market improves “to realize the best prices,” Chief Executive Officer Bryan Marsal said.

Ummm. Think about that. A defunct, bankrupt financial company is sitting on enough yellowcake to start World War III and they plan to hold it until they can sell it to the highest bidder?

The hypocrisy of such a thing boggles the mind. Evidently Lehman started playing in the uranium commodities market shortly after its bankruptcy declaration, when prices were much higher than they are today. They came into possession of the actual uranium cake as the result of a matured commodities contract.

If nothing else, this illustrates the moral bankruptcy of our financial services system. Uranium should not be an asset on the books of a bankrupt speculator as a result of post-bankruptcy speculation. It just shouldn’t.

How can we criticize North Korea or Iran for their nuclear programs when we have an American company selling the fuel for their reactors (or bombs, depending on your point of view)? How can it be possible that fat-cat unbailed bankers own 500,000 pounds of uranium?

In my opinion, there’s a moral obligation to put such material in the hands of the US government, bailout or no bailout. Lehman was not bailed out. They were allowed to go bankrupt. They were allowed to speculate after they declared bankruptcy, purely for the possibility of increasing their assets no matter what the strategy. They decided to invest in the fuel for the destruction of the world.

Does that bother anyone but me? Forget terrorists, we have renegade, morally corrupt bankers in possession of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS of uranium yellowcake. Because after going bankrupt from speculating on mortgages, they decided to speculate on nuclear weapons. And they were allowed to.

Let that sink in. Let it make you mad. Let it spur you to protest.

Because if we do not draw a line somewhere, there will be no lines to draw.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

1
Vote -1 Vote +1exador23
April 15, 2009 at 12:19 pm

um…. I’m speechless. It took a couple re-reads to come to grips with the fact that this was literal and not a metaphor. Lehman and their ilk have already dropped The Big One on retirement accounts, non-profit trust funds, and other elements of the economy people need to have trust in.

We’re still spending around $10Billion/month in a war that was sold to us with a fabricated story about Saddam Hussein having ~attempted~ to obtain yellow-cake, and here one of the least trusted actors in our economy, with a track record of putting greed above all other considerations, is actually in possession of some.

I think I’ll go throw up now.

2
Vote -1 Vote +1@Karoli
April 15, 2009 at 10:25 am

Dennis, thanks for the links on the restrictions. Here’s what bothers me: We have absolutely no foundation to trust that these bankers are going to comply with restrictions or laws. They haven’t so far. They’ve done what they want, arrogantly and without regard for others’ lives or well being. What’s to stop them from holding the US government hostage with this stuff, to tell us that we HAVE to give them something in exchange for compliance with the rules on the sale and distro of this stuff? Seriously, they are untrustworthy stewards, and shouldn’t have any control over such dangerous materials.

3
Vote -1 Vote +1Dennis
April 15, 2009 at 6:28 am

Here is a good article on restrictions for exporting and importing uranium oxide (yellowcake). Lehman would be subject to this UN placed restrictions. Lehman still has a good market opportunity for the material right here in the USA where it can be re manufactured into HEU and LEU (high and low enriched uranium). Canada needs HEU for their medical isotopes reactors. Energy producing reactors worldwide require LEU.

http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:Gmcad0FFOXkJ:isis-online.org/publications/iran/Iran_Yellowcake.pdf+yellowcake+restrictions&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Also a good Wiki explanation of what HEU is

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enriched_uranium

4
Vote -1 Vote +1@Karoli
April 14, 2009 at 9:18 pm

@cyn3matic I couldn’t believe it wasn’t. I honestly never knew that just anyone could speculate on nuclear material. I thought there were tight controls on the stuff. I guess not. I suppose I am naive about some things, but as you pointed out on twitter, we practically have to sign our firstborn away for Sudafed while evil bankers hold enough destruction in their hands to end the world.

It just. boggles. the. mind.

5
Vote -1 Vote +1cynematic
April 14, 2009 at 9:00 pm

For the love of all that’s sane, why isn’t this illegal?

Leave a Comment

Previous post: FOX in the Henhouse

Next post: Need Rush as Head of Repubs Again